If you were asked to advise European Union policy makers today about how to plan for the future, what would you say? In your answer, include advice on issues such as expansion, more intense pursuit of economic, political, and/or military unions, dealing with the instability caused by terrorism, and so forth. What are the costs and benefits of pursuing any particular path to resolve these issues?
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. Identify the EU's policies to date on expansion, unions, and so forth.
2. Explain the pitfalls of expansion, which may center on security and/or economics. Consider how political and/or military unions might address such pitfalls. Consider important contemporary issues such as terrorism and regional recessions for the future of the EU.
3. Describe the costs and benefits of pursuing any particular path to resolve such issues. Again, economics, security, sovereignty, and other such issues may come into play.
4. Provide a concise summary and effective conclusion.
You might also like to view...
When George W. Bush was at his weakest, to which president did he repeatedly compare himself?
A) John F. Kennedy B) Abraham Lincoln C) Harry Truman D) Ronald Reagan
What was the status of affirmative action in college admissions after the Supreme Court decisions in Bakke v. University of California Board of Regents (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)?
a. Affirmative action policies that consider race a plus factor (among other things) are permissible, as the advancement of diversity is a compelling government interest. b. Affirmative action policies are assumed to be unconstitutional unless the university can demonstrate the need to promote racial tolerance. c. Affirmative action policies must ensure that all racial and ethnic groups are represented in accordance with the population of the nation as a whole. d. All forms of affirmative action are unconstitutional because they unfairly favor some people over others based on the color of their skin.—