In arguing propositions of fact, as an opponent you have two strategies for responding to the advocate's arguments, denial and extenuation

What must you examine to decide whether strategies of denial and extenuation will be appropriate for refuting the advocate's arguments?
(a) How the advocate uses presumption.
(b) How the advocate defined terms.
(c) How the advocate's placement of arguments of effect, significance, and inherency organized the message.
(d) How the advocate's arguments satisfy the requirements of the stock issues of factual argumentation.

D