What are the consequences in evaluating a program with a program theory that is not sound, and what can be done to correct the problem?
What will be an ideal response?
A program whose design is weak or faulty has little prospect for success even if it adequately implements that design. Thus, if the program theory is not sound, there may be little reason to assess other evaluation issues, such as the program’s implementation, impact, or efficiency. Within the framework of evaluability assessment, finding that the program theory is poorly defined or seriously flawed indicates that the program simply is not yet evaluable.
When assessment of program theory reveals deficiencies, one appropriate response is for the responsible parties to redesign the program. Such program reconceptualization may include (a) clarifying goals and objectives; (b)?restructuring program components for which the intended activities are not happening, needed, or reasonable; and (c) working with stakeholders to obtain consensus about the logic that connects program activities with the desired outcomes. The evaluator may guide or facilitate this process.
You might also like to view...
In some states in the U.S., officials have the authority to set the course of study in schools—that is, to determine what must be taught and what may not be taught
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
All of these forces help explain the reasons that impoverished children tend to enter school academically behind their more affluent counterparts EXCEPT that:
-they have fewer books at home. -they are less apt to have home computers. -they rarely go to museums.