What methods are used in comparative politics to assess the falsifiability of hypotheses?
What will be an ideal response?
To assess the degree to which hypotheses can be falsified or stand up against the facts, we use the comparative method, a way of examining patterns of facts or events to narrow down what is important in terms of building a convincing comparative politics argument. There are two basic approaches to the comparative method:
1. The method of agreement, which compares and contrasts cases with different attributes but shared outcomes; or
2. The method of difference, which compares and contrasts cases with the same attributes but different outcomes.
You might also like to view...
Pennsylvania was a royal colony
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Once cloture is invoked, each senator may speak on a bill for no more than one hour before a vote is taken and afinal vote must take place within _________ hours.
A. seventy-five B. one hundred C.two hundred D. fifty