The case of Texas v. Johnson found that __________ was protected speech.

What are the two important characteristics that hypotheses in comparative politics require?

What will be an ideal response?

How would you change existing legislation in order to find an acceptable compromise between the freedoms of the press (e.g., freedom of speech, protection of sources) and the ability of the government to perform its duties (e.g

, safeguarding national security, prosecuting illegal activities)? What will be an ideal response?