Why do social psychologists sometimes choose to deceive participants about the true purpose of an experiment? What is the primary argument against deception in experiments?
What is debriefing and how does it relate to experimental deception? In other words, what is the purpose of debriefing?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Social psychologists sometimes deceive experimental participants in order to avoid the problem of demand characteristics, or cues in the study that make participants aware of how the experimenter wants them to behave. By distracting participants from the actual purpose of the study, researchers are better able to produce natural reactions in participants. Debriefing is a post-experimental procedure in which the experimenter discusses procedures, hypotheses, and participant reactions with the participant. Its primary purpose is to alleviate any problems or concerns that the participant might have as a result of participation in the study. Debriefing should be performed for any experiment, but it is particularly important when deception is involved. Debriefing may also include a discussion of the costs and benefits of the research.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following students provides the best information about the metacognitive skills of elderly people?
a. Pascal: "Elderly adults are similar to young adults in accurately predicting which items they will recall at a later time." b. Ladi: "Elderly adults are consistently less effective in monitoring their memory." c. Jacqueline: "Elderly adults have less knowledge than young adults about how their memory works." d. Lucy: "In general, elderly adults and young adults are similar, except that elderly adults spend less time on any given metacognitive task, in comparison to young adults."
All of the following are circumstances of today's workplace that seem to require adaptive performance except:
a. Reliance on the status quo b. Globalization c. Changing technologies d. Corporate restructuring