With reference to cosmetics and over-the-counter drugs, what should the plaintiff prove for the court to conclude that the defendant is guilty of negligent failure to warn?
What will be an ideal response?
When a toxic or allergic reaction causes harm to the user of a cosmetic or an over-the-counter drug, many courts find that there is no duty to warn unless the plaintiff proves that:
1. the product contained an ingredient to which an appreciable number of people would have an adverse reaction;
2. the defendant knew or should have known, in the exercise of ordinary care, that this was so; and
3. the plaintiff's reaction was due to his or her membership in this abnormal group.
You might also like to view...
Which one of the following is not a weakness of a third-party prepared pay survey?
(a) user may be unable to identify respondent (b) requires little of user's time (c) may require resummarization to meet user demands (d) user is unable to weight data by importance of responding organization to the user
Which of the following is not an example of the cost of quality?
A. Prevention costs. B. Internal failure costs. C. Target costs. D. Appraisal costs.