How did the Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019?
A. It allowed partisan gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the judiciary.
B. It allowed partisan gerrymandering based on the principle that no level of gerrymandering can be "too partisan."
C. It disallowed partisan gerrymandering by ruling that the courts should not be burdened with questions of redistricting
D. It disallowed partisan gerrymandering based on the argument that it violates the "one person, one vote" principle
Ans: B. It allowed partisan gerrymandering based on the principle that no level of gerrymandering can be "too partisan."
You might also like to view...
The supreme court does not need to hear every appeal that comes its way. Instead the justices can issue a ________ _____ ______________ on a case selected from lower courts.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
In a free market economy, the government has rights to make decisions about buying and selling private property
What will be an ideal response?