Refer to Table 19-24. Suppose that a very simple economy produces three goods: pizzas, haircuts, and backpacks. Suppose the quantities produced and their corresponding prices for 2011 and 2016 are shown in the table above
Use the information to compute real GDP in the year 2011 and 2016. Calculate real GDP in 2016 assuming the base year is 2011. Do the same calculation assuming the base year is 2016. Are the calculations different? Why?
Recall that real GDP is found by valuing GDP in a particular year using base year prices. When 2011 is the base year, real GDP for 2016 is found by multiplying 2011 prices by 2016 quantities and then adding the values up. The individual values for 2016 (2011 is the base year) are calculated in the following table:
Product Quantity Price Value
Pizzas 120 $10 $1,200
Haircuts 45 15 675
Backpacks 210 40 8,400
Therefore, Real GDP for 2016 (2011 base year) =
Quantity of pizza in 2016 × price of pizza in 2011 = $1,200
Quantity of haircuts in 2016 × price of haircuts in 2011 = $675
Quantity of backpacks in 2016 × price of backpacks in 2011 = $8,400
Total $10,275.
The individual values for 2016 (2016 base year) are calculated in the following table:
Product Quantity Price Value
Pizzas 120 $12 $1,440
Haircuts 45 20 900
Backpacks 210 45 9,450
Therefore, Real GDP for 2016 (2016 base year) =
Quantity of pizza in 2016 × price of pizza in 2016 = $1,440
Quantity of haircuts in 2016 × price of haircuts in 2016 = $900
Quantity of backpacks in 2016 × price of backpacks in 2016 = $9,450
Total $11,790.
When 2016 is used as the base year, the calculation of real GDP is larger as compared to the calculation of real GDP for 2016 assuming 2011 is the base year. The values differ because the prices are different in 2011 and 2016, so the value of real GDP does depend on the chosen base year. However, since we use the same base year prices for every year when we calculate a GDP series, we can still compare real GDP across the different years.
You might also like to view...
If we choose more work we sacrifice leisure
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An expansionary monetary policy may be less effective than a restrictive monetary policy because:
A. the Federal Reserve Banks are always willing to make loans to commercial banks that are short of reserves. B. fiscal policy always works at cross purposes with an expansionary monetary policy. C. changes in exchange rates complicate an expansionary monetary policy more than they do a restrictive monetary policy. D. commercial banks may not be able to find good loan customers.