What was the rationale for rejecting the claim that the federal government needed to abolish Jim Crow laws because they conflicted with the equal protection clause?
a. The federal government should not interfere in states' rights to determine their own equal protection laws and should not practice social engineering.
b. The federal government should leave the decision up to each state because in some states Jim Crow laws were important for maintaining social order.
c. Jim Crow laws helped African Americans achieve equality by building character through overcoming adversity, so to declare them a violation of equal protection would be counterproductive.
d. The equal protection clause applied only to the actions of the federal government, so states were within their rights to enact Jim Crow laws.
a
You might also like to view...
The National Organization for Women
A) was first formed in the nineteenth century to help women gain the right to vote. B) was primarily responsible for ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. C) is no longer a formidable force for women?s rights. D) now works for the enactment of individual statutes (laws) to protect women?s rights rather than a constitutional amendment. E) is a counter-interest group formed by Phyllis Schlafly to oppose the Women?s Liberation Movement and the Equal Rights Amendment.
What are parcel taxes?
What will be an ideal response?