Of the three main types of reasoning discussed in your text, select two and explain the main differences between them. Using a hypothetical topic, construct an argument with each of the two selected
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Arguments will vary, but answers should include two of the following:
Inductive reasoning: a general conclusion is based on specific examples, facts, statistics, and opinions. Includes reasoning by analogy (comparison) and reasoning by sign (the existence of one thing means the other thing will happen).
Deductive reasoning: reasoning from a general statement or principle to reach a specific conclusion. This is the opposite of inductive reasoning. This can be structured in the form of a syllogism which includes a major and minor premise as well as a conclusion. You must ensure both of these premises are true and can be supported with evidence.
Casual reasoning: relates two or more events in such a way as to conclude that one or more of the events caused the others. This can be done either as reasoning from cause to effect or reasoning from effect to cause.
You might also like to view...
In what ways does one’s notion of what constitutes winning an argument influence the way he or she argues?
What will be an ideal response?
A speaker says, "Now that we have looked at the problem, let's turn our attention to the solution." Which device is the speaker using?
A. a spotlight B. an internal summary C. a bridge D. a signpost