What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a plural executive?

What will be an ideal response?

Varies. Some of the advantages include the division of labor to deal with the multitude of issues that could overwhelm any one person or smaller set of individuals. By focusing on a category of tasks, an executive can concentrate his or her energy on solving problems that she/he can manage well. This structure provides an additional set of checks against the concentration of authority. On the downside, having many executives in charge of administering state law and helping to govern means that accountability is obscured, and no one person is really "in charge." The governor does not have the power to control the decisions other executives make, yet the voters have difficulty discerning who is responsible for decisions. Because all the executive officers (the governor excepted) operate in relative obscurity, voters cannot hold anyone but the governor accountable for the mistakes made by those at the top, even if the governor is not the source of their discontent. Their decision-making is uncoordinated. Finally, members tend to compete for each other's jobs because of term limits, because most of them want to stay in office and they can only occupy one office for a maximum of 8 years.