Why do some policymakers argue that military action is a more humane approach than imposing total sanctions on a country?

What will be an ideal response?

Many policymakers and activists argue that military action might actually be more humane than a total embargo of a state. That may sound far-fetched, but when you consider that sanctions—when applied severely—can cut a state’s economy in half, one can certainly understand why sanctions are not necessarily considered the most humane option available when trying to coerce another state.