What are the differences between realist (including neorealist) and liberal scholars of international relations and foreign policy? Discuss the different assumptions and units of analysis for each theory. Which theory better explains the current U.S. foreign policy environment?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should define realist schools of thought as those that focus on a pessimistic view of human nature and an anarchical global system. Liberal schools of thought focus on a more positive view of human nature and look to dependent and institutional relationships among states in the international system. Realists tend to focus on interstate relations, whereas liberals focus on opening the “black box” and looking inside nation-states. Answers regarding current U.S. foreign policy will vary but could point to the false dichotomy often discussed about the two theories.
You might also like to view...
Jews are the most cohesive religious group when it comes to voting
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Which statement about Boko Haram is INCORRECT? a. It has been chiefly active in the Niger Delta
b. In response to its activities, President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in three states. c. It received support form Al Qaeda affiliates. d. It views Nigeria's secular education system as corrupt and immoral. e. It has been chiefly active in the north.