Discuss the characteristics of a successful multi-echelon supply chain
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: For such a multi-echelon distribution supply chain, a good replenishment policy has the following characteristics:
• All parties within a stage are divided into groups such that all parties within a group order simultaneously from the same supplier.
• When a party receives a replenishment order, the receipt should be synchronized with the shipment of a replenishment order to at least one of its customers. In other words, a portion of any replenishment order at a stage should be cross-docked onto the next stage.
• If a customer replenishes less frequently than its supplier, the supplier replenishment frequency should be an integer multiple of the customer replenishment frequency and replenishment at both stages should be synchronized to facilitate cross-docking. In other words, a supplier should cross-dock all orders from customers who reorder less frequently than the supplier himself.
• If a customer replenishes more frequently than its supplier, the customer's replenishment frequency should be an integer multiple of the supplier's replenishment frequency and replenishment at both stages should be synchronized to facilitate cross-docking. In other words, a supplier should cross-dock one out of every k shipments to a customer who orders more frequently than himself, where k is an integer.
The relative frequency of reordering will depend upon the setup cost, holding cost, and demand at different parties.
Replenishment orders in multi-echelon supply chains should be synchronized to keep cycle inventory and order costs low. In general, each stage should attempt to coordinate orders from customers who order less frequently and cross-dock all such orders. Some of the orders from customers that order more frequently should also be cross-docked.
You might also like to view...
Marion was a guest at Hotel 9. She forgot her purse in her room while she was in the Hotel restaurant and upon returning, discovered that it had been stolen
Marion made a report to the hotel manager and advised him that she had valuables in her purse totaling approximately $10,000. The manager advised her that in accordance with the notice posted by the hotel on the back of the room door, the hotel's liability was limited to $100. Marion indicated that she had not read the notice and had no knowledge of its contents. Which of the following is TRUE? A) The hotel is responsible for the full amount of Marion's loss as the law does not allow hotel operators to try and limit their liability to guests. B) The notice posted by the hotel is effective to limit its liability to $100. C) The hotel is liable for the full amount of Marion's loss only if it can be proven that it occurred as a result of its negligence. D) The notice posted by the hotel is an exclusion clause which will be strictly interpreted by the courts. E) The hotel could have by the notice, effectively limited its liability but as Marion has not read the notice, then it is liable for the full amount of her loss
Olympics Inc knows that Ray-Duke Construction is on the edge of possible bankruptcy and desperately needs money to meet its payroll next week. Olympics owes Ray-Duke $100,000 for construction work
Olympics says to Ray-Duke, Take $50,000 in full settlement or sue us. It will be two years before you get a judgement in court." Ray-Duke accepts because it can't wait two years. What remedy, if any, does Ray-Duke have to get the other half of the money from Olympics? A) Misrepresentation. B) Undue influence C) Non est factum D) Economic duress E) Ray-Duke has no remedy.