Why was the January 2015 visit and speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a significant indicator of congressional–presidential relations? How did the speech circumvent the long-standing understanding of the president and Congress’s relationships with foreign leaders? What impact could this speech have on U.S. relationships with other countries?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should identify how Congress’s invitation to Netanyahu was in response to President Obama’s continued negotiations with Iranian leaders over Iran’s ongoing nuclear development programs. The Republican-majority House of Representatives, led by Speaker John Boehner, bypassed the long-standing tradition of hosting foreign leaders through presidential invitation. Answers should identify how Congress’s invitation signaled to other U.S. allies that its domestic tensions (between Congress and the president) may result in inconsistent and unreliable behavior by the United States.
You might also like to view...
According to Crane Brinton, which of the following is the last stage of revolution?
a. Intellectuals become dissatisfied with the system. b. A Thermidor occurs. c. Moderates seize power. d. Extremists take over.
In an attempt to create greater accountability of the bureaucracy to the public, Texas has adopted procedures enhancing openness in government, including
a. open-meetings laws. b. the administrative review system. c. the "Iron Texas Star.". d. a cabinet system. e. the legislative committee structure.