Discuss the issue of human rights laws at the international level. How, and why, has human rights law developed? What types of rights would you add to this legal body in the 21st century, and why?
What will be an ideal response?
Ideal Answer: The ideal answer should:
1. Define human rights law.
2. Explain the intersection of human rights law and the international system.
3. Analyze how and why human rights law developed, taking into consideration the complications sovereignty creates for enforcement, insofar as human rights law is problematic via the way in which it entails interference by one state in another's internal affairs.
4. Discuss what types of rights and/or protections might be added to human rights law in the 21st century, taking into account recent history and historical precedence as regard, for example, "enemy combatants" and the complicated distinction between civilian and combatant brought about by contemporary conflicts. Private military forces may also be taken into consideration, given their expanding role in contemporary military actions. Further, as food and water scarcity become more widespread human rights issues around those problems will certainly become more prominent in the 21st century.
5. Provide a concise and effective conclusion.
You might also like to view...
With the exception of Chechnya and regions in the north Caucasus region, separatism never truly threatened the unity of the Russian state, and ethnicity,
while socially important, has been a relatively unimportant form of political identity in most of Russia. How has Russia been able to achieve this successful de-mobilization of ethnicity? What will be an ideal response?
The candidate who, because of his disparaging remarks about railroad engineers, alienated the railroad unions and had to face negative signs along the right-of-way of his campaign train, was
A) Grover Cleveland. B) James G. Blaine. C) Thomas Dewey. D) Richard Nixon. E) Harry Truman.