Some people think it's unfair that celebrities like Kim Kardashian earn a lot more than people who add so much more value to society, like teachers. What do you think explains this wage differential?
What will be an ideal response?
The wages that are paid to celebrities and teachers will depend on each person's ability to produce labor of economic value. Compared to say, teachers, celebrities like Kim Kardashian add a great deal more economic value to the firms that hire them. The fact that the ad revenue and other earnings that they generate are so high could explain their relatively higher wages. Keep in mind that even though teachers are likely to be more important to society than a celebrity, there are far more teachers than celebrities, who are in extremely limited supply. At the margin, the last teacher hired adds less to output than does Kim Kardashian, as measured by her contribution to total revenue.
You might also like to view...
In most less developed countries, the initial target of import substitution is to promote domestic production of
(a) consumer goods. (b) food and other agricultural goods. (c) capital goods. (d) manufactured intermediate goods.
Because cooperation dominates noncooperation as a strategy for maximizing profits, cheating is rarely if ever an issue that cartels have to contend with
Indicate whether the statement is true or false