Nicolas is the director of Bit Industries, a drill manufacturer. He is also a major shareholder of Deep Green Corp, a leading landscaping tools manufacturer. Bit undergoes a financial crunch and finds it difficult to raise money

Nicolas signs up Bit as a supplier of drills to Deep Green Corp Having obtained a new client, Bit manages to avoid financial distress. However, Nicolas has not informed anyone of what he has done. Can this transaction be voided? If yes, on what grounds can it be voided?

When a corporation cannot take advantage of an opportunity because of financial constraints, a director or officer must do his or her best to secure financing of the opportunity by the corporation, although neither need go so far as to lend the corporation money. In general, taking personal advantage of the opportunity when financing is clearly unavailable is allowed. In this scenario, Nicolas secures financing for Bit Industries as it could not raise money on its own. A potentially troublesome situation occurs when an officer or a director, or a corporation in which the officer or director has an interest, enters into a transaction with the corporation. This problem, known as a conflict of interest, is specifically addressed by the Revised Model Business Corporations Act (RMBCA). The act provides that a transaction will not be voided because of a conflict of interest when any one of the following is true: 1. The material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were disclosed or known to the board of directors or a committee thereof, and the board authorized, approved, or ratified the transaction; 2. the material facts of the transaction and the director's interest were known or disclosed to the shareholders entitled to vote, and they approved, authorized, or ratified the transaction; or 3 . the transaction was fair to the corporation. In this scenario, though Nicolas has not informed the shareholders or the board of directors of Bit Industries of the business deal, the transaction has been fair to the corporation. On these grounds, the transaction cannot be voided.

Business

You might also like to view...

Marketers should understand that people's core beliefs and values tend to be ________

A) fixed B) highly flexible C) similar around the world D) constantly and rapidly changing E) easily influenced by secondary beliefs

Business

Redrock Inc. is a household products firm that is considering developing a new detergent. In

evaluating whether to go ahead with the new detergent project, which of the following statements is MOST correct? A) The company will need to hire 10 new workers whose salaries and benefits will total $400,000 per year. Labor costs are not part of capital budgeting and should be excluded. B) The company will need to use some equipment that it could have leased to another company. This equipment lease could have generated $200,000 per year in after-tax income. The $200,000 should be excluded because the equipment can no longer be leased. C) The company will produce the detergent in a building that it renovated 2 years ago for $300,000. The $300,000 should be excluded from the analysis. D) The company will produce the detergent in a building that they already own. The cost of the building is therefore zero and should be excluded from the analysis.

Business