What are the political consequences of a plural executive?
What will be an ideal response?
Varies. Governing power is both divided and shared among many offices in California, and although different officers are tasked with separate responsibilities, they may choose to implement laws differently based on their own interpretation of the law. Officers are accountable to the voters, and even the governor cannot tell them what to do. A fragmented power structure works against the production of consistent government policy and counteracts accountability. Under term limits, California's executives are potential or actual rivals for the same offices. Relative anonymity may also be considered a consequence (with 12 individual executives carrying out a variety of tasks, few except the governor capture enough media attention to become well-known).
You might also like to view...
How does the nature of political campaigns in the United States impact people's likelihood of voting?
A.) U.S. campaigns are too short for voters to get to know and care about a candidate B.) U.S. campaigns have elections on Saturday, when most people are out of town C.) U.S. campaigns are long and drawn out, and voters lose interest D.) U.S. campaigns are too positive, and voters prefer a little drama to stay interested
The concept that successful collaboration on one set of problems would encourage similar efforts in other areas is something emphasized by the
a. mass mobilization school. c. transnationalist school. b. functionalist school. d. structuralist school.