How would you apply the scientific process to the question of why men typically earn more than women?

What will be an ideal response?

Here, we might start with the simplifying assumption that men differ from women, but not from other men. Therefore, we can compare one group (men) to another group (women). First, we would have to observe a situation where men earn more than women. Second, we would have to construct a theory about why men earn more than women in this situation. Perhaps the job is "dangerous," requires a large amount of physical strength or is too time consuming to allow time to raise children. Perhaps men and women have different levels of education. There are a variety of theories that could be applied to this situation. Third, we would have to identify additional implications of the theory. Perhaps men and women earn the same in occupations that are not dangerous, do not require a lot of physical strength and have flexible work schedules. Fourth, we would have to collect data on earnings and the characteristics of the men and women in the occupation with the earnings disparity. Data could be collected through employers' records or surveys. This data would be used to test the theory. Fifth, the theory would be refined based on how well it fits the data and whether new observations become available.

Economics

You might also like to view...

An example of an intermediate good would be

A) the bread that goes into a sub sandwich that is sold by Quiznos. B) the soda pop sold by Quiznos. C) a sub sandwich sold by Quiznos. D) the potato chips sold by Quiznos.

Economics

The Medicare Trust Fund is

A. held in the corporate bond market. B. held in the stock market. C. invested in gold. D. loaned to the US Treasury and, therefore, held in bonds.

Economics