Compare and contrast between in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
What will be an ideal response?
A court may have jurisdiction to hear and decide a case because it has jurisdiction over the property of the lawsuit. This is called in rem jurisdiction ("jurisdiction over the thing").
Sometimes a plaintiff who obtains a judgment against a defendant in one state will try to collect the judgment by attaching property of the defendant that is located in another state. This is permitted under quasi in rem jurisdiction, or attachment jurisdiction. Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, Section 1), a judgment of a court of one state must be given "full faith and credit" by the courts of another state.
You might also like to view...
Management by exception directs the management's attention to important differences between the actual and the budgeted amounts
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The U.S. accounts for 60 percent of the marketing research expenditures worldwide
Indicate whether the statement is true or false