Describe the argument that education generates a positive externality. Why might this externality not be relevant in terms of economic efficiency?
What will be an ideal response?
Education is often said to produce a positive externality because there are positive spillovers from getting an education for which the consumer of education is not compensated. For example, we all benefit from a literate society in that it makes it easier to facilitate market transactions. This externality may not be relevant in economic efficiency terms because it may not be inframarginal. If the externality is inframarginal, an increase or decrease in education on the margin will not increase or decrease the social benefit or cost. Thus if education is inframarginal in the current range because individuals have sufficient private incentives to produce the current level, then any socially beneficial benefits from education would have already been produced.
You might also like to view...
In the long run, firms in both monopolistically competitive markets and perfectly competitive markets earn zero economic profits, but unlike perfectly competitive firms in the long run, monopolistically competitive firms
A) charge a price that is equal to marginal cost. B) charge a price that is equal to average total cost. C) do not produce at minimum average total cost. D) charge a price that is greater than average revenue.
How many British pounds would it cost to buy a pair of American designer jeans costing $45 if the exchange rate is 1.50 dollars per British pound?
A) 10 British pounds B) 20 British pounds C) 30 British pounds D) 35 British pounds E) 25 British pounds