Nuclear deterrence is often presented as a Prisoner's Dilemma game. Why? Describe the logic of nuclear deterrence and demonstrate how it can be analyzed as a PD game on the basis of a real-world example
What will be an ideal response?
Ideal Answer: The ideal answer should include:
1. Outline nuclear deterrence and the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
2. Assess how nuclear deterrence might be presented as the Prisoner's Dilemma game, perhaps focusing on the Cold War's opposing alliances of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, where each side had the choice to arm or disarm.
3. Explain how the consequences of the following three options demonstrate the complexities of nuclear deterrence as PD game: disarming while one's opponent continues to arm, both sides deciding to arm, or both sides disarming.
4. Utilize real world examples to illuminate explanation and assessment.
5. Conclude with a concise and effective conclusion.
You might also like to view...
What are the four dimensions, or elements, of political engagement?
A. political interest, political efficacy, political information, and strength of party identification B. political mobilization, political interest, political efficacy, and political information C. direct mobilization, political mobilization, political interest, and political efficacy D. direct mobilization, political mobilization, political interest, and political information E. political efficacy, political mobilization, political information, and strength of party identification
The __________ interprets the Supremacy Clause and the executive branch enforces it
Fill in the blanks with correct word