Why are fish in the ocean an example of a resource that suffers from the tragedy of the commons but cattle grazing in a farmer's pasture do not suffer from the tragedy of the commons?
What will be an ideal response?
Fish in the ocean are a common resource because they are rival, so that one person catching a fish prevents others from catching the same fish, and they are nonexcludable, so that no one can be prevented from fishing. As a result, over-fishing is likely to occur. But cattle grazing in a farmer's pasture are not a common resource. The cattle are rival, so that one person butchering a steer prevents others from butchering the same steer, but the cattle are excludable, so that no one can butcher a steer unless the cattle's owner is compensated. As a result, the owner has the incentive to conserve the resource, that is, the owner has the incentive to insure that the cattle are not overused.
You might also like to view...
From the Keynesians' perspective, a short-run Phillips Curve exists because
A) wages and prices are perfectly flexible. B) money demand is unstable. C) investment is unstable. D) wages change more slowly than the price level.
When the absolute price elasticity of demand is less than 1, demand is
A) elastic. B) unit-elastic. C) inelastic. D) undetermined without more information.