Mr. Frank, a foreman supervisor some 43 employees, was asked by his secretary to sign a form requesting additional supplies needed on the factory floor. He was not careless when he examined the form, but his secretary had cleverly arranged the signature line so that instead of signing a request form for supplies he signed a cheque payable to his secretary. What plea, if any, would be used to defend against her action on the cheque?
a. Mistake
b. Illegality of object
c. Rescission
d. Non est factum
e. Rectification
Answer: d. Non est factum
Economics
You might also like to view...
If the price of potato chips increases, other things constant, demand for potato-chip dip will
a. not change; only quantity demanded will change b. increase because the goods are substitutes c. decrease because the goods are substitutes d. decrease because the goods are complements e. increase because the goods are complements
Economics
What happens when demand increases and supply does not change
What will be an ideal response?
Economics