What are the three tests that are used by the jurisdictional rule of reason in determining jurisdiction in anti-trust cases?
What will be an ideal response?
The jurisdictional rule of reason sets out a three-pronged test to determine jurisdiction in anti-trust cases involving conduct outside the United States: (1) Was the alleged conduct intended to affect the foreign commerce of the United States? (2) Was it of such a type and magnitude to violate the Sherman Act? (3) As a matter of international comity and fairness, should a court assume extraterritorial jurisdiction over the matter?
You might also like to view...
What is the most likely date on which the stock options were awarded?
Billy, the CEO of Movin On Up Company, was granted stock options with an exercise price of $62.04 per share. The following are the week-ending stock prices that occurred during the quarter: Date Stock Price 7-Sep-05 56.82 13-Sep-05 57.24 20-Sep-05 60.51 27-Sep-05 57.23 4-Oct-05 60.14 11-Oct-05 60.42 18-Oct-05 61.5 25-Oct-05 59.84 1-Nov-05 60.02 8-Nov-05 60.14 15-Nov-05 61.52 22-Nov-05 61.67 29-Nov-05 63.94 6-Dec-05 62.39 13-Dec-05 62.04 20-Dec-05 64 27-Dec-05 65.52 A) 13-Sep-05 B) 11-Oct-05 C) 13-Dec-05 D) not enough information to answer the question
The feature of social institutions that means mechanisms are in place to determine responsibility for an action is called:
A) due process. B) accountability. C) the courts of appeal. D) the judicial system. E) responsibility.