In Whalen v. Union Bag & Paper Co, where a paper mill polluted a farmer's creek so he sued to stop the pollution, the appeals court noted that:
a. if courts refused to grant injunctions when the damage to the plaintiff is slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition, it would favor the poor litigant over rich defendants
b. if courts refused to grant injunctions when the damage to the plaintiff is slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition, it would deprive the poor litigant of his little property by giving it to those already rich
c. if courts refused to grant injunctions when the damage to the plaintiff is slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition, it would increase pollution
d. if courts refused to grant injunctions when the damage to the plaintiff is slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition, there would be no more pollution suits
e. if courts refused to grant injunctions when the damage to the plaintiff is slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition, it would unfairly favor low income plaintiffs
b
You might also like to view...
New knowledge and tools used to improvise productivity and systems are referred to as _______.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
When using the LIFO inventory costing method, ending merchandise inventory will be the lowest, as compared to FIFO and weighted-average inventory costing methods, when costs are increasing
Indicate whether the statement is true or false