In the debate about whether rich countries should help poor countries develop, what reasons are given for helping poor countries? What can governments of rich countries do that will either help or hinder poor countries? How can foreign aid contribute
to global stability and security?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Describe how many Americans and others in rich democracies see the inequalities between the rich and poor as morally wrong and something to be rectified through aid for refugees, education, clean water, public health, and the like.
2, Discuss how political and economic leaders of rich countries can either help or hinder poor countries by determining whether they have access to trade markets, encouraging or discouraging corporate investments in and technology transfers to those countries, and making life more or less difficult for migrants coming from those countries.
3, Detail how foreign aid contributes to global stability and security by preventing "failed states," where resource supplies may be imperiled, terrorism may breed, and from which desperate refugees may stream to neighboring countries, destabilizing them as well.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following explains why federal states are associated with smaller government?
A. The governments often consist of a single party in federalism. B. The federalist approach requires a unicameral approach. C. There is a highly proactive approach toward radical welfare policies in the federal system. D. Federalism systems fail to maintain the principles of a welfare state when large. E. Federal systems require a second legislative chamber.
"A situation, such as occurred during the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, in which one side's gain is the other side's loss" is a definition of
a. zero–sum. b. multilateral treaties. c. collective security. d. preemptive force. e. globalization.