Describe the arguments presented by those in favor of amending or rewriting the Articles of Confederation and those who were opposed.
What will be an ideal response?
Larger states such as Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts had much more to gain in revising the Articles of Confederation, particularly after Shays’ Rebellion and similar uprisings threatened the internal security of these states. Larger states were much more in favor of a stronger national government that could help in regulating the value of currency, intervening in disputes between states, and providing foreign and domestic protection in the form of a regular and professional army that was not at the will of the states. Given that they had much larger populations, they argued for a representative system based on population, whereas the smaller states were satisfied with the unicameral and state-centered system that the Articles had established. Given that smaller states had the same vote in the legislature as the larger states, they were not in favor of amending the Articles, as this would reduce the amount of sovereignty and influence afforded the smaller states.
You might also like to view...
In which of the following wars have nuclear weapons been used?
a. World War I, b. World War II. c. The Korean War d. The Vietnam War.
Which of the following statements best describes the importance of public opinion in evaluations of the George W. Bush administration?
a. Public opinion surveys during the 2000 election demonstrated that foreign policy issues ranked dead last on the list of voters’ concerns, and foreign policy played only a nominal role in evaluations of the administration and the president’s job approval ratings. b. After the 9/11 attacks, President Bush experienced several short bursts of high approval ratings due to the rally-around-the-flag effect, but as war fatigue set in and political violence in places such as Iraq increased, those items caused a significant decline in his approval ratings in the last years of his presidency. c. The public was generally dissatisfied with President Bush’s domestic policies and subsequently were unsupportive of his foreign policy performance, leading to low approval ratings throughout his presidency. d. The president’s job approval ratings throughout his presidency reflected the public strongly supported both his domestic and foreign policy performance.