If events in a single country cause its economic activity to move up or down through a business cycle, what difference(s) might it make that the economy is closely integrated with other economies in the world?

What will be an ideal response?

One consequence of global integration is that goods and saving can flow to where they seem to offer the highest return, adjusted for risk. An economy with, say, political instability is likely to see a substantial outflow of saving, while imports might flow in where domestic output has been disrupted. Thus, other economies might benefit from the first economy's misfortune. Or, the decrease in income in one economy might hurt its trading partners by depressing demand for their exports. Similarly, financial disruption in one economy might spread to related economies. In either case, once economic conditions seem to be improving in a globally-connected economy, the expansion is likely to be strengthened by saving inflows and ready availability of markets for both imports and exports. In sum, the correlation of growth rates in linked economies may be strengthened or weakened when one economy is faltering. When one economy is booming, the effect is to strengthen the correlation.

Economics

You might also like to view...

With regard to its economic profits and economic losses, how is the short run different from the long run for a perfectly competitive firm?

What will be an ideal response?

Economics

During the Iraq War, the U.S. government continued to borrow funds and yet the interest rate was steady or slightly declined. What could explain this?

A) The U.S. crowded out private saving. B) The U.S. crowded out private borrowing. C) The supply of loanable funds increased by a greater proportion than demand increased. D) The supply of loanable funds increased by a smaller proportion than demand increased.

Economics