In a study conducted by Zimbardo and colleagues, participants were directed to decide how much shock to administer to another ‘subject' in the study. Participants either wore hoods that obscured their face or remained uncovered. Researchers found that:
a. participants who were not wearing hoods would have administered four times as much shock as those wearing hoods.
b. participants who wore hoods would have administered twice as much shock as those who were not wearing hoods.
c. participants who were not wearing hoods would have administered twice as much shock as those who were wearing hoods.
d. participants with and without hoods would have administered the same level of shock.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
Shelley wants her grandma to keep in touch through e-mail but her grandma says, "Oh, Shelley, you know that you can't teach an old dog new tricks!" If Shelley has been studying the problems with popular beliefs about psychological phenomena, how should sh
What will be an ideal response?
Professor Bach hands each of his students an eraser. He then asks them to list as many possible uses for the eraser as they can think of. Which aspect of thought was Professor Bach exploring?
A) Divergent thinking B) Convergent thinking C) Dichtomous thinking D) Creative thinking