Evaluate the argument: “Restricting imports from other nations will save U.S. jobs.”
What will be an ideal response?
The argument is a flawed one for several reasons. First, imports may eliminate some U.S. jobs, but they create others in those sectors that import products. Import restrictions change the composition of employment, but they have little effect on the total amount of employment. Second, there is a fallacy of composition with the argument. Restricting imports may help the U.S., but they make other nations that trade with the U.S. poorer and thus the actions will eventually hurt U.S. exports. Third, other nations can retaliate by imposing restrictions on imports from the U.S., thus causing a trade war that hurts all nations. Fourth, in the long run a nation must import to export. Domestic dollars spent on imports become income for foreign nations that they in turn can spend on U.S. exports.
You might also like to view...
Lauren runs a chili restaurant in San Francisco. Her total revenue last year was $110,000. The rent on her restaurant was $48,000, her labor costs were $42,000, and her materials, food and other variable costs were $20,000
Lauren could have worked as a biologist and earned $50,000 per year. An economist calculates her implicit costs as A) $150,000. B) $63,000. C) $50,000. D) $110,000. E) $0 because Lauren did not work as a biologist.
The price elasticity of supply
a. will be positive when supply is elastic and negative when it is inelastic. b. will be negative when supply is elastic and positive when it is inelastic. c. will always be positive. d. will be positive when demand for the good is inelastic. e. will be positive when demand for the good is elastic.