In McConnell v. FEC (2003), the Supreme Court
a. upheld most of the provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
b. struck down most of the provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
c. refused to review the major provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
d. ruled that Congress can never interfere with the free speech rights of Americans to contribute to political parties.
a. upheld most of the provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.
You might also like to view...
The Bill of Rights guarantees rights of the people to peaceably assemble, but the Supreme Court has allowed local governments to do which of the following?
A. Regulate the size of any and all assemblies, on public or private property B. Limit the duration and loudness of demonstrations, allowing officials to eliminate business disruptions C. Prohibit demonstrations by religious or hate groups D. Require permits for parades and demonstrations, allowing officials to control traffic or prevent demonstrations from turning into riots E. Prohibit demonstrations staged in religious enclaves
The "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?" scenario reveals that equality of wealth is a permanent attribute of American democracy and capitalism
Indicate whether the statement is true or false