In the case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled that
a. the president must abide by the rule of law in the “war on terrorism.”
b. the president is free to wage the “war on terrorism” without congressional and judicial oversight.
c. the federal courts have no jurisdiction over the actions of the president in times of war.
d. Congress overstepped its bounds in limiting President Bush’s powers in the “war on terrorism.”
a. the president must abide by the rule of law in the “war on terrorism.”
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a provision of the Affordable Care Act?
a. Insurance companies can only stop covering someone during the January open-enrollment period. b. Young people must be allowed to remain on their parents' insurance until the age of 26 c. All caps for out-of-pocket expenses must be eliminated by 2019 d. Doctors can charge patients no more than $10 for preventive care like mammograms, flu shots, and diabetes tests.
Identify an accurate statement about the intermediate scrutiny standard
A) Under the intermediate scrutiny standard, a law must be necessary to promote a compelling personal interest of a senior citizen. B) Every law or action that prevents people from exercising a fundamental right is subject to the intermediate scrutiny standard. C) The intermediate scrutiny standard is employed only when there is no classification-such as race or gender-that would require a higher level of scrutiny. D) The intermediate scrutiny standard was developed for the purpose of deciding how to judge cases in which men and women were treated differently. E) A state law that contradicts a federal law is subject to intermediate scrutiny by the Supreme Court.