Marty, a 16-year-old, contracted with Cream-of-the-Crop Cycles to buy an $8,000 motorcycle. He agreed to make monthly payments until the purchase price plus interest were paid in full. It is three years later and Marty has not disaffirmed the contract and has made regular payments on the cycle since turning 18 . Which of the following is correct?
a. The contract is void and Marty has no obligation.
b. The contract is now voidable by Cream-of-the-Crop Cycles.
c. Marty has ratified the contract and is now bound by its terms.
d. Marty has ratified the contract but can still get a return of the payments made while he was a minor.
c
Business
You might also like to view...
Under common law, which of the following persons is most likely to be classified as an invitee?
A) a mail carrier B) a social guest C) a door-to-door salesperson D) a solicitor for a charitable organization
Business
When past practice and clear-cut contractual language conflict
a. past practice supersedes language. b. language supersedes past practice. c. the merits of the case become paramount. d. a compromise is desirable.
Business