Observe the difference in vending machines between canned soda and newspapers. Typically, if you insert coins into a newspaper vending machine and open it you will see available all of the copies of the newspaper within one's reach
However, soda machines are very different. They work such that only one can is dispensed at a time. The rest of the canned soda is well out of reach. Explain in terms of marginal utility why the newspaper distributor is relatively unconcerned about the rest of the newspapers being taken without payment while the soda distributor uses a machine that goes to great lengths to insure that only one can of soda is dispensed at a time.
The answer is fairly straightforward. A second or third newspaper probably has close to a zero marginal utility for the typical consumer. The second copy doesn't really provide him with any net gain in satisfaction. However, the rest of the canned soda in all likelihood would still have a positive marginal utility for most consumers. Therefore, it is worth it to spend a little extra money on a machine that keeps the rest of the product away from prying hands. By contrast, the low incidence of theft of newspapers provides no justification for a more complex vending machine.
You might also like to view...
Real GDP per person is not an accurate measure of the standard of living because it ______
A. includes the goods and services that governments buy B. omits the goods and services that people produce for themselves C. includes goods and services bought by firms D. omits the goods and services imported from other countries
The unintended consequences of the federal deregulation of the interest paid depositors in the savings and loans was
A. increasing the interest rates in the national money market. B. increasing the amount of the loss on existing loans. C. allowing management to make riskier loans. D. affecting the interest rates on existing long term loans.