Why is compellence harder to achieve than deterrence?
a. A deterrence threat is easier for the target state to understand than compellence.
b. Compellence tends to be more vague in its objectives than deterrent threats.
c. Compellence involves the threat of overwhelming force and most states do not possess this.
d. Compellence demands more humiliation from the target state than does deterrence.
e. Deterrent threats are more difficult to carry out than are compellent actions.
Answer: d
You might also like to view...
What is the national debt?
What will be an ideal response?
In the context of approaches to legal interpretation, modernists differ from originalists in that they__________
A) believe that the Court should look to the intentions of the founders B) seek to examine the Constitution in the context of today's society C) contend that the government should do nothing that is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution D) advocate that the Court should stick strictly to the text of the Constitution E) propose that the Constitution should be rewritten in its entirety