According to the discussion of gender comparisons in verbal ability, a meta-analysis reported an effect size of 0.11 . From this information, you can conclude that
a. 11% of the studies reported a significant gender difference.
b. the effect size is so low that the researchers' expectations must have influenced the results.
c. most studies reported significant gender differences, although the size of the gender difference was small.
d. in general, males and females do not differ in their verbal ability.
D
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT considered plagiarism?
a. taking credit for someone else's ideas, data, or words b. using someone else's words without quotation marks or proper citation. c. using someone else's ideas. d. giving credit to someone else's ideas without quoting him or her directly
In the case of Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal (2009), the Supreme Court addressed the conflict of interest posed by a judge who hears a case concerning a company that significantly contributed to his reelection campaign.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)