Compare judicial restraint, judicial activism, and strict constructionist philosophies
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Note that all three are philosophies used by judges to help them reach a decision in a case.
2. Discuss that judicial restraint focuses on not overruling the decision of other branches, whereas judicial activism asserts that judges should use their power broadly.
3. Explain that a strict constructionist emphasizes the Constitution based on the Framers' original intent.
You might also like to view...
Research has shown that business/economic interest groups outnumber all other types of organizations in terms of their lobbying presence in Washington, D.C
Why do some scholars view this as problematic for the functioning of our political system? Could it be argued that this is not a problem at all? What will be an ideal response?
What is the concept of laïcité?
A. The concept of creating a classless state based on common ownership. B. The principle of increased influence of religion in state affairs. C. The principle of strict separation of church and state in France. D. A set of values that emphasizes a non-materialistic form of living. E. The concept that monarchies derive their right to rule from heavenly authority.