"A government surplus can decrease investment through the crowding-out effect because the surplus decreases the supply of loanable funds." Is the previous assertion right or wrong? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
The assertion is wrong on two counts. First, the crowding-out effect asserts that a government budget deficit—not a surplus—decreases investment. Second, a government surplus increases—not decreases—the supply of loanable funds.
Economics
You might also like to view...
The African agrarian system is characterized by
(a) absentee landlords. (b) a dual agrarian system known as latifundio-minifundio. (c) land fragmentation. (d) shifting cultivation.
Economics
Along a linear demand curve,
a. both the slope and price elasticity are constant b. the price elasticity is constant, but the slope varies c. total revenues are constant d. the slope is constant, but the price elasticity varies e. total revenues are negative
Economics