What were the cases that led to corporate political speech being considered protected speech?

What will be an ideal response?

In the 1978 case of First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a state law that prohibited certain corporations from making contributions or expenditures influencing voters on any issues that would not materially affect the corporate assets or business. Stating that "the concept that the government may restrict speech of some elements of our society in order to enhance the relative voice of others is wholly foreign to the First Amendment," the high court ruled that corporate political speech should be protected to the same extent as the ordinary citizen's political speech. The ability of the government to regulate corporate political speech was further restricted in 2010 by the landmark decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. By a 5-4 vote, the majority ruled that the corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment, thus finding political spending to be a form of protected speech.
The decision struck down a provision of a 2002 campaign financing law that prohibited all corporations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, and unions from broadcasting "electioneering communications," which were defined as "a broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that mentioned a candidate within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary."

Business

You might also like to view...

Allowing the desires of the other party to prevail is what type of conflict-handling style?

What will be an ideal response?

Business

Which of the following should ideally dictate the organizational structure and staffing needs of the firm?

A) the firm's customers B) the size of the firm C) the firm's strategy D) the firm's short-term objectives

Business