“If it were not for the law of diminishing marginal returns, the world’s wheat could be grown in a flower pot.” Explain.

What will be an ideal response?

The law of diminishing returns states that beyond some level of variable input, such as labor, additional amounts of input add diminishing (but not necessarily negative) amounts of output, other inputs held constant. So, holding land constant, additional amounts of labor or fertilizer yield diminishing additional wheat output. If there were no such law, additional amounts of the variable input would yield constant or increasing marginal output, so additional land would never be needed.

Economics

You might also like to view...

What explains any divergence between nominal and real GDP?

A) Constant prices B) Changing prices C) Constant output D) Changing output E) None of the above.

Economics

Using aggregate demand and aggregate supply analysis, explain why increases in oil did not lead to stagflation in 2006-2008 but did lead to stagflation in the 1970s and early 1980s

Economics