How was the mutual assured destruction (MAD) different from nuclear utilization theories (NUTS)?
a. MAD considered a possibility of fighting a nuclear war, while NUTS was based
on deterrence
b. MAD was based on deterrence, while NUTS considered a possibility of fighting a
nuclear war
c. MAD was the policy of the Cold War, while NUTS was the policy of the post-
Cold War era
d. MAD considered a possibility of fighting a nuclear war, while NUTS put more
emphasis on the importance of conventional warfare
e. MAD and NUTS were not policies
b
You might also like to view...
Totalitarian regimes are similar to authoritarian regimes as both forms of non-democratic regimes ________
A. employ extensive efforts to coercively mobilize the support for the regime B. allow individuals to mobilize and collectively organize along cultural or other non-political forms of identity or interests freely C. attempt to shape the interests and identities of citizens by articulating a coherent ideology that promotes plurality and diversity D. avoid using coercion to mobilize their society except in cases of national emergency and war E. limit political pluralism by controlling non-political societal groups and repressing political opposition to remain in power
In British legislation, Government bills are bills introduced and sponsored by the cabinet, while Private Members' Bills are introduced by non-cabinet members
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.