What problems with the bureaucracy do provisions against the revolving door and provisions protecting whistle-blowers attempt to alleviate? To what extent do they seem to work in Texas? Should such provisions be strengthened? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Identify the rationale for provisions against the revolving door as ethical concerns and guarding against co-optation.
2. Identify the rationale for whistle-blower protection as a way to encourage public employees to report mistakes and intentional wrongdoings in their agencies (i.e. corruption and inefficiency).
3. Explain that the efforts have had limited and uncertain success. There is still concern about co-optation, and potential whistle-blowers may be intimidated by fears of retaliation, by intimidation from supervisors, and general difficulties in the process.
4. State and defend a position on strengthening of provisions to control the revolving door and to protect whistle-blowers.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following are congressional actions taken during the budget process?
A. agencies to testify at hearings regarding budget request B. development of the estimate of the total size of the federal budget C. issuing an appropriations warrant D. review by the judicial branch
According to Jacques-Benigne Bossuet, kings were ______.
A. chosen by the people, not by divine right B. chosen by the people, but held accountable by God C. chosen by God directly, thus accountable only to God D. chosen by God directly, but accountable to the people