Describe how courts can evaluate the adequacy of a product's design

What will be an ideal response?

In evaluating the adequacy of a product's design, a court may apply a risk-utility analysis. This requires the court to consider the gravity of the danger posed by the design, the likelihood that injury will occur, the availability and cost of producing a safer alternative design, the social utility of the product, and other factors. Some courts apply a consumer expectation test, which requires a showing that the product is more dangerous than the ordinary consumer would expect.