What is the relationship between comparative and historical research and the use of secondary data sources?
What will be an ideal response?
Historical and comparative social science investigations use a variety of techniques that range from narrative histories having much in common with qualitative methods to analyses of secondary data that are in many respects like traditional survey research; most historical and comparative methods encourage causal reasoning. They require the researcher to consider systematically the causal mechanism, or historical sequences of events, by which earlier events influence later outcomes.
You might also like to view...
What did Andrew Jackson think of patronage appointments?
a. He believed they were unnecessary. b. He believed they should only be given to military veterans. c. He believed they should only be used on the state level. d. He believed they improve efficiency and democratic accountability. e. He hated them.
Which of the following is not true of public diplomacy?
a. Public diplomacy has only recently began to be used by the State Department and can largely be traced to social media. b. Public diplomacy goes over the heads of foreign leaders by appealing directly to the citizenry of other countries. c. Public diplomacy may strengthen international support for the United States in ways beyond the reach of conventional diplomats and political leaders d. The messengers of public diplomacy are uniquely positioned to project the nation’s cultural values and demonstrate the vitality of its civil society.