The Fighting Words Doctrine determined that
A) violent acts may be justified if provoking language is harsh enough.
B) censorship can be justified against insulting language that is likely to provoke violence.
C) libel does not apply where a history of "fighting words" can be proven between the two parties.
D) language, no matter how violent, is still protected by the First Amendment.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
You want to give a five-minute speech to persuade the audience to stop buying products made from the fur of animals. Which considerations about the use of visual aids would you be wise to take into account for your presentation?
What will be an ideal response?
Factual proof is always grounded in experience, either one's own or that of someone else
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.