What was the basis of the court's decision in Nickel Developments Ltd. v. Canada Safeway Ltd.?
A) Nickel was in breach of contract because it was an express term that it would not lease to another supermarket in the shopping centre.
B) Safeway was in breach of contract because it was an implied term, in order to meet the officious bystander test, that Safeway would continue to operate its supermarket in the shopping centre.
C) Safeway was not in breach of contract because there was no express term in the lease requiring it to continue operating its store in the shopping centre, nor could such a term be implied.
D) Safeway was in breach of contract because it was the custom in shopping centre leases that the anchor tenant will not abandon its business.
E) Both B and D
B
You might also like to view...
Outbound direct response telemarketing is most successful when it is tied into a database and either customers or prospects are contacted
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Given the following data about an assembly line and the knowledge that we are trying to attain an output rate of 40 units per hour, what is the theoretical minimum number of stations?
Work Element Time (sec) 1 90 2 80 3 75 4 70 5 90 6 85 A) four or fewer stations B) five stations C) six stations D) seven or more stations