Discuss the opposing points of view on U.S. trade deficit.
What will be an ideal response?
Those who worry about trade deficits point out that these capital inflows create debts on which interest and principal payments must be made in the future. In this view, Americans have been mortgaging our futures to finance higher consumer spending. But another, quite different, interpretation of the trade deficit is possible. Suppose foreign investors come to see the United States as an especially attractive place to invest their funds. Then capital will flow here, not because Americans need to borrow it, but because foreigners are eager to lend it. The desire of foreigners to acquire American assets should push the value of the dollar up, which should in turn push America’s net exports down. In that case, the trade deficit would still be the mirror image of the capital inflows. But it would signify America’s economic strength, not its weakness.
You might also like to view...
Firms should hire additional units of a resource as long as the
a. marginal product of the resource exceeds the price of the resource multiplied by the quantity of output produced. b. marginal product of the resource is less than the price of the resource. c. price of the output produced is positive. d. marginal revenue product of the resource exceeds the cost of employing an additional unit of the resource.
A firm reaches a break-even point (normal profit position) where:
A. marginal revenue cuts the horizontal axis. B. marginal cost intersects the average variable cost curve. C. total revenue equals total variable cost. D. total revenue and total cost are equal.